Ron Paul – now there’s a name I’ll bet you haven’t heard in a while.

Last November, I decided to take a look at Ron Paul’s platform and post the results in an editorial. I titled it “Ron Paul Will Never Be President.” The result? A massive flaming campaign was directed at the editorial. It received wave after wave of bashes and angry comments from delusional Paulites. “He’s America’s only hope,” they said. They also said that because I disagree with Ron Paul, I must hate freedom and love George Bush. You have to love the hypocrisy.

Nonetheless, after re-reading some of the comments in the above linked editorial, I thought that it was high time to rub my prediction in peoples’ faces. Not only will Ron Paul not be president, but he made a piss-poor showing. The millions of fanatics who spammed websites and message boards, the people who wasted hours inflating poll statistics, and the people who swore up and down that they would register Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries were totally and utterly full of shit.

I’ll even offer another little tidbit: Ron Paul failed not because he was poorly treated by the media, or because he wasn’t given a fair shake during debates (though both those statements are true). He failed because his policies come off as batshit insane. Maybe if he didn’t make outlandish promises, like abolishing the Federal Reserve or the CIA, he may have gotten somewhere. The thing is, people hear shit like that and immediately write him off as a babbling loon.

One cannot suggest that such radical changes be implemented. People hate change. In order to change the system to the extent that Ron Paul suggested, those changes would have to be implemented gradually, over a long period of time. That, or the changes would have to have remarkable advantages over the current system. Ol’ Ronnie should have just kept his mouth shut about his more radical plans – maybe then he’d have had a fighting chance.

So, like the dancing baby, Chuck Norris and Bert Is Evil, Ron Paul has had his 15 minutes of internet fame. He can now safely be locked away in the Vault of Forgotten Internet Fads forever.






Related Links:
Ron Paul And Racism
Trends And Ron Paul
Ron Paul Will Never be President? - A Point by Point Rebuttal
Ron Paul Will Never Be President
Ron Paul is Currently Winning The Fox News Debate Poll
AdBrite Ad Here



Comments

These comments in RSS.
Comment View Threshold:
jackanape, on 5/11/2008 12:18:11 AM
Total Posts: 2334, Joined: 3/27/2006
@Trooper:

Like Quebec matters.

I keed, I keed.
To be honest, I don't know too much about Trudeau as I was tiny when he was in power, but I find it amusing that he did more to project French Bilingualism nationally, yet he's still disliked by Quebeckers

Checking out his wikipedia page, I'm actually a little more intrigued by the guy. Friends with Castro, Getting a nod from John Lennon, redoing the constitution and ditching the monarchy.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
Dock, on 5/11/2008 10:28:01 AM
Total Posts: 2215, Joined: 11/12/2005
Ron Paul hates freedom. Shouted.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Trooper111k, on 5/11/2008 1:06:32 PM
Total Posts: 465, Joined: 3/28/2007
"he did more to project French Bilingualism nationally, yet he's still disliked by Quebeckers"

That's because he wanted to enforce bilingualism in Quebec, where more than 85% of the population speak french. And the majority of people here considers themselve as Quebeckers, while Trudeau said the nation of Quebec doesn't even exists. He also liked to be provocative, like taking the front stage during the St-Jean Baptiste, our national holyday, while denying our existence. If that's not being an asshole, I don't know what it is.

"redoing the constitution and ditching the monarchy."

Oh, we're still in a constitutional monarchy, something Trudeau never changed. And while reading about the patriation of the Constitution, you may find interesting he did it without the agreement of our province, thus alienating Quebec and officially not making it part of this country. Not that any federalist think it matter.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
MyOwnFlag, on 5/11/2008 2:24:01 PM
Total Posts: 1113, Joined: 7/30/2006
Just like a neutron star in the internet universe he got too big and collapsed in on himself.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
jackanape, on 5/11/2008 4:53:07 PM
Total Posts: 2335, Joined: 3/27/2006
"That's because he wanted to enforce bilingualism in Quebec, where more than 85% of the population speak french. And the majority of people here considers themselve as Quebeckers, while Trudeau said the nation of Quebec doesn't even exists. He also liked to be provocative, like taking the front stage during the St-Jean Baptiste, our national holyday, while denying our existence. If that's not being an asshole, I don't know what it is."


Check around the rest of Canada. Quebec is of course the primary French speakers. There's a few communities out west here that do, but for the most part, the rest of the country is english.

I happen to agree with Trudeau. What in the fuck makes you think you deserve anymore special treatment than the rest of the country? If anything, more creedence belongs to the native tribes whose languages have all but vanished.

Trudeau pissed off many westerners too, but like I said, you can't please everyone. Canadian politicians have been kissing Quebec's ass for so long now, and yet you guys still think you deserve even more. Nonsense.

During the 80's, Trudeau took a lot of money from the first boom and shovelled it straight over to Quebec and Ontario, which in turn caused Liberals to be fairly non-existent, especially here in Alberta. The Adscam thing pretty much clinched conservative support out here, making people think that Quebec's elitist pandering was still going on, which it is.

That's the general sentiment out here. Quebec is daddy's favorite, while Alberta was being treated like the government's red-headed step child.
This has changed considerably with Harper in power, but not to any good extent for the people living here.

So I suppose we all have our personal grudges against Trudeau.

Anyways, enough of Trudeau, and back to Mr. Paul.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2WrtrPJpF4

Let me know if this clip goes missing.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Trooper111k, on 5/11/2008 6:17:40 PM
Total Posts: 466, Joined: 3/28/2007
"Check around the rest of Canada"

I did travel there. Worst experience of my whole life.

"What in the fuck makes you think you deserve anymore special treatment than the rest of the country?"

What the fuck make you think we want a special treatment? Half of us want independance, the majority of the other half the ability to be autonomous within the country. That isn't a fucking special treatment, it's being a fucking confederation. You know, the thing we're supposed to be.

" If anything, more creedence belongs to the native tribes whose languages have all but vanished."

They already have, on the respect side, that is. Before 2006, Ottawa aknowledged the existence of the First Nations, but not Quebec. They have advantages like limited autonomy with that. We don't. I send half my fucking taxes to Ottawa and I want them back to my true and only country; Quebec.

"Canadian politicians have been kissing Quebec's ass for so long now, and yet you guys still think you deserve even more. Nonsense."

That's the core of the misunderstanding. Federalism isn't profitable to Quebec(and several others provinces might I add). Tell me a single thing Quebec got the rest don't, and I'll show you how it's another proof we're getting the wrong end of the stick.

"During the 80's, Trudeau took a lot of money from the first boom and shovelled it straight over to Quebec and Ontario"

Looks like you weren't there during the 80s: we were in a fucking recession. And when Ontario and Quebec is in a recession, that means the whole country is in it. We're the damn beating heart and lung of this country, and I can assure you what Trudeau did was nothing more that the usual equalization payments of today, which is pale in comparison of what each of those provinces shovel at the federal government themselves.

"The Adscam thing pretty much clinched conservative support out here, making people think that Quebec's elitist pandering was still going on, which it is."

The Adscam is only another proof on how things are done in Ottawa. Corruption, shady deals and the like are common, way more than in the provinces. Also, the only elite that profited from this was federalist might I add. They call themselves Canadians, not Quebeckers.

"That's the general sentiment out here. Quebec is daddy's favorite, while Alberta was being treated like the government's red-headed step child."

The irony is, we see things the complete other way here. You pollute the whole country, refuse to handle in a responsible way the oil industry and make inflation go higher and higher. Good thing the US recession is happenning, or else the federal funds rate would still be damn high.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
Mustnotsleep, on 5/11/2008 6:48:17 PM
Total Posts: 279, Joined: 7/1/2007
fad?
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
jackanape, on 5/11/2008 7:10:23 PM
Total Posts: 2338, Joined: 3/27/2006
"The irony is, we see things the complete other way here. You pollute the whole country, refuse to handle in a responsible way the oil industry and make inflation go higher and higher. Good thing the US recession is happenning, or else the federal funds rate would still be damn high."

See, I understand where you're coming from. You had problems with Trudeau, but so did we. I think that's why we both feel shafted, but in a way, it was for the benefit of the country as a whole.

Culturally, Quebec blows Alberta out of the water, but as far as your whole 'heart' comment, well, unfortunately Alberta is the machine supplying a ton of revenue.

But, don't blame Albertans for the way the oil companies dominate. You can blame that specifically on the heads of Harper and his PC goonsquad.

Pretty much any Albertan who isn't paid from big oil is seeing the costs go up and the dollar go down. I assume that works for the rest of the provinces as well.

Dion will never get the support of the west, and the conservatives own the media. Layton couldn't even win right now because the government is purposely distorting the news.

This isn't speculation. I read the paper daily, then crosscheck a lot of the stories online. Yes I need better hobbies, but the fact remains that Canadians are being just as manipulated as the US FOX viewers.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Trooper111k, on 5/11/2008 7:43:22 PM
Total Posts: 467, Joined: 3/28/2007
"but in a way, it was for the benefit of the country as a whole."

That's true, if you consider the country as the federal government. That's why I'm still mad about it.

"unfortunately Alberta is the machine supplying a ton of revenue."

As I see it, those revenues mostly stay in the province. Which is, in a way, good for you. But the thing is, the federal government hoard all the money, and we don't see it back here in the province. So I assure you we don't profit it at all.

"But, don't blame Albertans for the way the oil companies dominate"

Of course I don't. But I can't help and be a little cynic when I see it has been nearly 40 years that Alberta is ruled by the Conservative party.

And about the medias, what can you expect? They are all owned by people who have interests served by political parties. Hell, everyone have interests, so an unbiase media would be quite unique. Good luck finding one, and if you do, please share it :D
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
jackanape, on 5/11/2008 8:12:39 PM
Total Posts: 2339, Joined: 3/27/2006
The CBC remains mostly unbiased, regardless what other news outlets may say. They are the only one, yet they're still in league with the CFR as far as the Ron Paul blackout goes now that I think about it.

Actually, fuck the CBC. They purposely manipulated AP stories to make it seem like McCain was the maverick longshot getting all the grassroots support.
Damned liars.

CBC does the most on showing the oilsands for what they are. I will give them that.

We need to be taking the media to task. Newspapers only regurgitate the same stories fed down the newswire because they are owned by corporate entities.

Here's a good article relating to the US media conglomerates.

http://adbusters.org/the_magazine/77/Media_Democracy
_on_the_March.html

This one relates to us Canadians.

http://www.canwestwatch.org

Do some reading.
These guys keep us purposely disinformed.
They don't care who is in power as long as they support their agenda.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Comments per page: 10

Post your comments

 

Your Message:

This system allows you to use html-like tags in replacement of HTML. These tags are easier to use and are widely supported on messageboard systems.

HTML DISABLED
CODE DISABLED

 

You must be a registered user in order to post comments.
Please sign in or create a new account.

Your Ad Here
Xxoozero
bulshoy
Dock
Romanov
LifeRiot
ThisisJeff
Bebichan
Sapphire
Shoutwire channels

whodareswinsThe List of The Errors on Shotwire Hope That Helps...
So its now as a link have a look folks http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/179116/Here_is_Some_Help_For_Soutwire_And_The_Problems

nodnarb232001Shoutwire To Interview The Westboro Baptist Church...
In a stunning display of pure awesomeness, our very own Dockwats has taken it upon himself to get in contact with the Westboro Baptist Church asking for an interview- and they agreed.You may remember the WBC for slogans like "God Hates Fags", "Thank God for Dead Soldiers", and "America Is Doomed"; and publicity stunts Freedom of Speech Expressions like picketing soldier's funerals, protesting at the VA Tech victims funerals, and praising the Lord for sending a huge ...