Two questions come to mind considering all the puzzle pieces. 1) Is more violence in the Middle East actually going to help U.S. security, or destabilize the region further? And 2) Is it really our physical security, or economic security, that is at stake here?


AdBrite Ad Here



Comments

These comments in RSS.
Comment View Threshold:
skins2153, on 3/15/2006 4:37:54 PM
Total Posts: 45, Joined: 2/6/2006
Soul Drift,

BE smart please, physical security is not be dependend on the mideast. That statement would imply that some mideast country is protect US (look a pun).
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
IdoAlphaOmega, on 3/15/2006 6:41:35 PM
Total Posts: 87, Joined: 11/30/2005
"Plus it doesnt really seem like the US wants to improve their relationship with the Arab world, they just want their oil."

What, like defending Kuwait when Saddam was mobilizing his army. Or how about when Milosevic was supposedly killing off Muslims?

I'm not going to argue that oil is not a big part of the US's involvement in the Middle East, but it is not the only one.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Souldrift, on 3/16/2006 10:15:57 AM
Total Posts: 12, Joined: 3/10/2006
Skins, think about it. If America lost its access to oil, and it's economy absolutely went into a *serious* depression, you don't think there'd be security problems? People robbing for food? I'm not suggesting Iran can hit us with bombs, only Bush is - but keeping Iran from controlling Iraq is allowing our economy to continue as it always has.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Xenophones, on 3/17/2006 10:59:28 AM
Total Posts: 23, Joined: 2/21/2006
There are limits to economic growth, limits not caused by other countries. Oil os a finite resource and will impose its own limits.

Going to war to prolong the business as usual life is simply delaying the inevitable AND killing thousands of people.

If the US economy tanks, the world goes with it. Be careful what you wish for, whether anti OR pro US.

lordzane is right too.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Souldrift, on 3/19/2006 5:45:25 AM
Total Posts: 16, Joined: 3/10/2006
Hey skins, check out the following white paper at Harvard, you might learn something: http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RW
P06-011/$File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf

"Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy."
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Comments per page: 10

  • Back
  • 1
  • 2
  • Page 2 of 2

Post your comments

 

Your Message:

This system allows you to use html-like tags in replacement of HTML. These tags are easier to use and are widely supported on messageboard systems.

HTML DISABLED
CODE DISABLED

 

You must be a registered user in order to post comments.
Please sign in or create a new account.

Your Ad Here
Xxoozero
bulshoy
Dock
Romanov
LifeRiot
ThisisJeff
Bebichan
Sapphire
Shoutwire channels

micmac988Premature Splooging
Ok, ladies, and some of you gents, this is for you.At some point in time EVERY guy has cum too soon. And it IS because he has a problem; over stimulation.Next to basement dwellers, married men have one of the worst sex lives. For married men it's a case of familiarity breeding contempt. For the basement dwellers, it's just lack of social skills and the sight of real live boobs.Women, if a guy cums quickly, it's a sign that he's very anxious to rock your thigh clam a...

BebichanInterview With Westboro Baptist Church!!!
This interview was compiled by myself and the great Nodnarb232001. Questions were selected from suggestions made by our great, dedicated, Shoutwire users, as well as a couple of our own suggestions!Nodnarb232001- Yep, and now we would like to ask Shirley Phelps-Roper old Freddy Phelps himself, and anyone from their congregation to come here defend their views from some of our users' unholy "persecution". We need to be reminded of just why we're going to hell.Just cl...