Circumcision, whether practiced on males or females, is mutilation. It is a violation of our rights, and should be condemned. There is absolutely no medical reason to perform it.

I wouldn't fuck a girl uncircumcised. Oh wait, i have. Actually, no chick i ever fucked had her genitals mutilated. Except for those stupid piercings of course.

Clinical studies (http://tinyurl.com/4o2ur) have shown that male circumcision reduces the chance of HIV/AIDS infection by up to 71-80% for circumcised men.

Female circumcision on the other hand, has no recorded medical benefits.

Chaotica: While I am severely against circumcision in all forms, it does not drastically reduce sensation for males. There is no difference in the glans between circumcised and uncircumcised males, which has been corroborated by numerous studies; however, the major difference comes from losing the frenulum and the ridged band. While it is a certainly a great loss, it does not result in drastically different sensations for both parties.

In the end, however, it is an unnecessary surgery that does reduce sensation, if only somewhat. The doctors that advocate and perform it should be criminally charged for mutilation.

@Chaotica

What's that you have there, "doctorsopposingcircumcision"... Wow, biased much? My source comes directly from the From the US Department of Health and Human Services:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Tinyurl botched the link. Here it is:
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm