58

Shouts

Shout it

6

Bashes

Bash it

Freedom of Speech in Canada Under Threat?

   Posted by Arsenal  Promoted 101 days 15 hours ago  1980 views   

    Politics / Law - Justice  |   Comments 26 comments  | 

  • Stumble it!
  • Facebook

Canada is often thought of as a land of bland consensus and multicultural harmony - the last place where you would expect to see a religious minority up in arms, and journalists accusing the state of gagging freedom of speech.


AdBrite Ad Here



Comments

These comments in RSS.
Comment View Threshold:
avatar
GodsSon, on 3/25/2008 6:37:18 PM
Total Posts: 634, Joined: 3/2/2006
Ain't that the truth! What's needed is more open debate on how to control and counter the problem of extremists on all sides, rather than outright censorship which appears to be biased towards one group in particular.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
Trooper111k, on 3/26/2008 8:23:59 AM
Total Posts: 370, Joined: 3/28/2007
Mark Steyn should be sued. The quotes were clearly hate speech to me, this cause should be before a court. The sheer retardness of his comments show a below-than-average intelligence added with poor judgement and a severe lack of historical, demographical and sociological knowledge, or just plain racism.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
RightwingRadical, on 3/26/2008 10:12:16 AM
Total Posts: 84, Joined: 4/4/2007
""rather go bankrupt" than let outsiders dictate the content of his magazine."
good for you buddy.
@Trooper
retardness, stupidity and poor judgment are not grounds for a civil suit. since the koran is 'god's word' god would need to sue him for slander, and the onus would be on god to prove it.
if you want a crimminal suit brought against this guy then fuck you. freedom of speech needs to be protected at all costs, including hurting people's feelings.
freedom of speech is the ability to say what others don't want to hear.
 |  Comment Score: Useful  |  Edit Comment
avatar
DeoKanon, on 3/26/2008 11:19:41 AM
Total Posts: 2057, Joined: 6/11/2006
we need to bomb someone.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
Liberal, on 3/26/2008 1:26:55 PM
Total Posts: 3729, Joined: 1/22/2007
RightwingRadical wrote:
""rather go bankrupt" than let outsiders dictate the content of his magazine."
good for you buddy.
@Trooper
retardness, stupidity and poor judgment are not grounds for a civil suit. since the koran is 'god's word' god would need to sue him for slander, and the onus would be on god to prove it.
if you want a crimminal suit brought against this guy then fuck you. freedom of speech needs to be protected at all costs, including hurting people's feelings.
freedom of speech is the ability to say what others don't want to hear.


QFT

its sickening to see people want to give up rights which cost the lives of so many people.

Freedom of speech means everyone not just you, have the right to voice an opinion.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
amoon2, on 3/26/2008 3:07:18 PM
Total Posts: 32, Joined: 12/20/2007
DeoKanon wrote:
we need to bomb someone.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
TheCanuck, on 3/26/2008 3:22:45 PM
Total Posts: 9, Joined: 9/25/2007
What the hell is going on in north america these days.

"its sickening to see people want to give up rights which cost the lives of so many people.

Freedom of speech means everyone not just you, have the right to voice an opinion"

I agree 100% Liberal, who the hell do these people think they are trying to tell us that we cant say whatever the fuck we want.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
cheesesteak, on 3/26/2008 3:25:04 PM
Total Posts: 251, Joined: 12/16/2007
There's a fine line between criticism and xenophobic maliciousness. These "critics" are in the same boat as Geert Wilders, Hirsi Ali and Robert Spencer--demagogues who liberally attack Islam and Muslims (not in the political sense). It's usually the same old arguments such as "Islam is a backwards religion/political system", "Muslims want to kill all infidels/rule the world" etc. etc.

These f*ckers make a career by scaring the population into fearing an otherwise unruffled minority/imaginary enemy, not so different from other figures in history. What we need is an Anti-McCarthy.
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
clansman, on 3/26/2008 3:26:20 PM
Total Posts: 372, Joined: 1/9/2006
Well said RightWingRadical, I was about to post the exact same thing.

I love that quote!
"He said he had published 27 letters in response to the Steyn article, and would "rather go bankrupt" than let outsiders dictate the content of his magazine."
 |  Comment Score: Neutral  |  Edit Comment
avatar
Hanafi, on 3/26/2008 4:07:45 PM
Total Posts: 3561, Joined: 3/30/2006
GodsSon wrote:
Ain't that the truth! What's needed is more open debate on how to control and counter the problem of extremists on all sides, rather than outright censorship which appears to be biased towards one group in particular.


We do need a debate.

Muslims desperately want to debate and prove these false claims about Islam from right-wing extremists wrong. But the right-wing extremists just aren't man enough to sit down in a proper debate, because they know all their empty accusations would be shattered, so instead they prefer to toss their false rhetoric unopposed.

I beleive in freedom of speech. But the Muslims here just aren't getting any opportunity to exercise freedom of speech, when mainstream media channels are refusing to publish their side of the story.
 |  Comment Score: Insightful  |  Edit Comment
Comments per page: 10

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Forward
  • Page 1 of 3

Post your comments

 

Your Message:

This system allows you to use html-like tags in replacement of HTML. These tags are easier to use and are widely supported on messageboard systems.

HTML DISABLED
CODE DISABLED

 

You must be a registered user in order to post comments.
Please sign in or create a new account.

Your Ad Here
Xxoozero
bulshoy
Dock
ThisisJeff
LifeRiot
Romanov
Shoutwire channels