USA Seeks to Controll Switzerland!!!!!

The United States warned that it was launching a legal review of a gas deal signed earlier this week between Iran and Switzerland to see whether it violates terms of US sanctions, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported. "We don't think that now is the time for people to be investing in Iran, not only in its petroleum or natural gas area, but in any sector of its economy," said State Department spokesman Tom Casey.

« View full article »

My Shout Count

Comments

These comments in RSS.

Comment View Threshold:

nova, on 3/26/2008 12:22:56 PM
Total Posts: 221, Joined: 4/10/2006

@ShanusMaximus Banking with the Nazi government did not violate Switzerlands Neutrality.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Housious, on 3/26/2008 1:49:27 PM
Total Posts: 25, Joined: 1/19/2008

You kids crack me up.

Woah something bad happened?

BLAME AMERICA!!!!!

This guy probably also believes George Bush personally planned the 9-11 attacks.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

jackanape, on 3/26/2008 2:39:47 PM
Total Posts: 2197, Joined: 3/27/2006

Housious wrote:
You kids crack me up.

Woah something bad happened?
BLAME AMERICA!!!!!
This guy probably also believes George Bush personally planned the 9-11 attacks.

Prove he didn't.
If you cite pop mech or the 911 investigation as proof, prepare to be laughed at.

| Comment Score: Trash | Edit Comment

mmasseeFTW, on 3/26/2008 3:00:44 PM
Total Posts: 180, Joined: 8/13/2006

"Prove he didn't."

Prove he did.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Liberal, on 3/26/2008 3:01:35 PM
Total Posts: 3730, Joined: 1/22/2007

lol, the swiss have a hard on for selling gas to anti-semites. Hey everyone be on the look out for cash flow fluxes in swiss bank accounts.

Now as this article doesn't mention recently UN, not US sanctions were placed on Iran. The Swiss as UN members are supposed to comply with these sanctions.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

ParticleMan, on 3/26/2008 3:01:50 PM
Total Posts: 1350, Joined: 12/5/2005

jackanape wrote:

Housious wrote:
You kids crack me up.

Woah something bad happened?
BLAME AMERICA!!!!!
This guy probably also believes George Bush personally planned the 9-11 attacks.

Prove he didn't.
If you cite pop mech or the 911 investigation as proof, prepare to be laughed at.

its not our job to prove retarded theories false, its your job to prove them true. and if you site ANY truther site, prepare to be laughed at (not that we ever stop laughing about those theories)

good luck with that.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

ShanusMaximus, on 3/26/2008 3:03:20 PM
Total Posts: 1467, Joined: 1/30/2006

@nova

Oh really?

http://www.german-way.com/gerpast.html

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

ShanusMaximus, on 3/26/2008 3:08:28 PM
Total Posts: 1468, Joined: 1/30/2006

@liberal

"Now as this article doesn't mention recently UN, not US sanctions were placed on Iran. The Swiss as UN members are supposed to comply with these sanctions."

Thanks for the answer Lib! So is it U.N. law they are breaking not U.S.
It didn't make sense to me why our laws would have any bearing on sanctions that another country does or does not have.
However if you are part of the U.N.... game - set- match.

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

HyenaThePIrate, on 3/26/2008 3:53:25 PM
Total Posts: 1962, Joined: 7/26/2006

LOL invasion plans since WW2..

i'm sorry but i dont think the "Anti-zepplin" cannons are going to cut it here.

Blowing up major roads? Would that stop an abrams? We have bridge layer vehicles. besides, who needs roads when you have the most advanced Air Force on the planet?

Invading switzerland would be a military cakewalk if ever a need rose.

But yeah this article is teh boolshit
(i'm trying to create new internet phrases).

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

otester, on 3/26/2008 4:29:34 PM
Total Posts: 5209, Joined: 11/14/2005

HyenaThePIrate wrote:
LOL invasion plans since WW2..
i'm sorry but i dont think the "Anti-zepplin" cannons are going to cut it here.
Blowing up major roads? Would that stop an abrams? We have bridge layer vehicles. besides, who needs roads when you have the most advanced Air Force on the planet?
Invading switzerland would be a military cakewalk if ever a need rose.
But yeah this article is teh boolshit
(i'm trying to create new internet phrases).

F/A-18C's and F-5II's will be ok, remember the airspace is rather small so range of effectiveness in regards to fighters is not as important.

Almost all households are armed with Steyr AUG's.

They also have the Leopard 2A4 to deal with the Abrams.

ADATS which performs low altitude SAM cover and anti-tank function, range 10km.

Not that easy...

| Comment Score: Neutral | Edit Comment

Comments per page: 10