BloodStainedUSA, it is common decency here to refer to a source when you copy and paste from a website. Funny thing is, that stuff you quote is just one of the first websites that pops up on google. Another funny thing is the word 'probably' in Mary's lineage.

Which comes basically down to this, if it is not mentioned clearly in the bible, we just make it out to be as we would like to think it to be.

And that's all the Bible is in the end, a bit playing around with words so you can interpret them any way you want.

From your copy and paste job, I take it, in the old days 'descending from' probably meant coming from a certain tribe (David's in this case), while today we know that descending from somebody means you are aligned genetically.

Of course God must have known about this DNA stuff since he all created it in the first place. But since he divinely inspired the Bible, why didn't he tell it right then? Why end up with such a fuzzy story then? Ok, he probably knew the 2000-year-ago-e-ans wouldn't have understood that genetic DNA blah blah, but he must have known the Bible should still mean something to us modern-day-e-ans who would have found out about DNA by this time.

Now I am wondering if somebody ever did a DNA test on both David and Jesus and thereby established Jesus his descendancy from David. We know today that children that seem to be born from a certain two parents can actually have one or two other genetic parents.

^You are missing his point entirely, and yet agian you look at some words and interpret them to suit your agenda or will.


Nor did you answer any one of immaculate's , immaculate points.

So you dont think it is possible that someone lied or just said that mary was in the blood line of david to ALSO further an agenda? How about when you parents jingled sleigh bells out side your window to reiterate the fact that Santa was right outside and about to drop down through the chimney!


...yah about the same thing.

yea, i never understood that either.

jesus died for our sins, which sins?

and if jesus died for those sins, and 'paid some debt' then why are you still effected by those sins? if they're gone, why do you still have them?

and why is there an original sin? What kind of sins have newborn babies commited?

sounds like a bunch of bullshit to me.

@ bloodstained, you have no relationship with god if you believe Jesus (pbuh) is his son, or apart of some wholly trinity bullshit, Jesus (pbuh) was a prophet of God.

Ah fuckit you fuckin christain's are to fucking stupid to listen anyway's.

"the bible should come with a warning label."

Now there's a good idea.